Each debrief is different.
There is a complex chain of considerations that go along with every debrief situation to be given due care. These considerations range from the relationship between the debriefer and debriefed; job, organisational and team context; the type of assessment and the nature of the assessment results; client expectations; stakeholder involvement; time availability; and, most importantly, the ultimate purpose of the debrief (e.g., improve self-awareness, change behaviour, improve sales, productivity or performance, address team or leadership issues, resolve conflict, more effective communication, etc).
Because every debrief is different, not all debrief conversations can (or should) be based on a script, formula, or structured process to be followed the same way through each time.
However, for practical purposes, it helps to know there are templates out there based on other experts’ years of trial and error which you can draw from and adapt to suit your own purposes. Below is one such template.
What follows are some basic guidelines, structures, and pointers we use to ensure a successful assessment debrief, and while the process is based on assessment use, it also has relevance to facilitation more broadly.
As a starting point and foundation for thinking about the role of the facilitator, it is important to remember the R3 concept (as developed by our American partners):
With the “Release” step landing fairly and squarely with the facilitator, the debrief discussion is all about creating an interaction that helps the individual or group understand, interpret, and apply the results of the assessment process in their personal and professional lives. To this end, we recommend the following questioning method.
The What-Why-How-How-Who questioning method is a formula to unpack any statement or graph in an assessment report. The process creates a structured, targeted, and meaningful conversation around an individual’s results.
This discussion will also help to generate options for the individual or group to understand and more effectively realise their potential.
The questioning method is comprised of 5 key questions:
An example of how each of these questions might sound:
There are a couple of key considerations to ensure the effectiveness of this process. The first is a solid understanding of the report section you are exploring and how it is built. This is important because it informs the framing of the questions.
The second is, while using a formula, we must also try to keep it conversational and not robotic. Think of the formula as a template or base, not a pre-planned set of specific questions we ask like a checklist.
This questioning framework can be conducted by the individual on their own, as a diad (the facilitator + one), triad (the facilitator + two), or as a group activity.
It is a great methodology to help people understand themselves and others by guiding them through a structured set of questions to unpack the information in their report.
The procedure might play out like this:
A few tips as the facilitator:
Depending on your purpose for facilitating this discussion, seek to relate the outcomes from the question to the specific goal of your session.
For example, if working with a group of leaders, we will want to explore how we can leverage these traits in the teams we lead, and how we might use the knowledge of these traits in designing and recruiting teams.
The most important thing to remember as a facilitator is that the report is a platform for the discussion. Use the feedback in the report to start the conversation and guide it to the outcomes specific to your participants.